The result would have given the United States footholds in south and east Asia at the very least, while it is unlikely that Germany would ever have acquired the ability to project armies across the vastness of the Atlantic Ocean, much less the Pacific. The best it could have done would have been to create a fleet of transatlantic bombers like the notional Amerikabomber which, incidentally, seems to have been designed with the idea of a one-way trip culminating not in a traditional bombing run but rather in crashing into New York City skyscrapers.
The B began development in , at a time when it seemed as if Hitler might indeed overrun all of Europe. The first prototype flew in and the huge six engine bomber became operational two years later. By , the United States possessed an arsenal of more than fifty atomic bombs. It is highly doubtful that Germany would have achieved any atomic weapons by that time, given how behind its nuclear program was.
To subscribe, click here. In South Asia, Britain was also defending its colonies and commonwealth against Japan. On the face of it, especially in the long term and even with Lend-Lease aid from the United States, it is difficult to see how Britain could have continued the war without the entry of the United States into the conflict on its side.
Presumably, Winston Churchill would have had to sue for peace, or endure a German invasion of the British Isles once the Nazis had consolidated their military strength in Europe. That did not happen, of course.
After Churchill heard that America had been attacked at Pearl Harbor, he rushed to a secure telephone to call Franklin Roosevelt. His Memoirs of the Second World War relate the following:. In two or three minutes Mr. Roosevelt came through. President, what's this about Japan? We are all in the same boat now.
No American will think it wrong of me if I proclaim that to have the United States at our side was to me the greatest joy. I could not foretell the course of events.
It is projected that fatalities would have been much higher as the Japanese at this time, and still are, to an extent, some of the most tenacious people on earth. For example, such forms of ritual suicide are common today and socially acceptable in Japan to protect honor and standing. Also, we tried to warn them. LeMay leaflets, anyone? However, to let it sink in, this was not morally correct, however, the alternative would likely have been a far bloodier and longer war.
However, the neat thing about humanity is that we can learn from these political mistakes. This is why fascism and totalitarianism has a bad rap to this day. For example, how do you think the North Koreans would act when they see a place like the US, Britain or the rest of Asia. This specific country is told by the Kim family that they the Kim family are gods and that the rest of the world is even worse off than they are.
Communism and Fascism yes, socialism in all forms belongs here too are the real problems, as they are are extremist systems that have to eliminate dissenters just to stay afloat.
Not to mention the disastrous effects on the economy. You must be a kid. War is evil and you must be evil to win. It is the guy that won the war. He is the one that writes history and will naturally make himself look good and the loser bad.
If Hitler won, we would say he has virtue and Allied were evil. Since he lost we say Hitler is evil and Allied are good people. It is life. The Nazis were…that alone makes them the bad guys. Germany was trying to invade them.
And your argument might be that people decide whether or not someone is evil by their own opinion. If you see a child being starved to near death would you believe that the parents are evil? Yes you would because they had a responsibility to feed them and they intentionally tortured a little child by not giving them food.
Nazis and Japanese could have world war 2 main mistake made by Japs is attack on pearl harbour which made to fight with united states the mistake made by Nazis is they created two way he should have completed invasion against the Britain he should not have been canceled the invasion. This way you have the oil and you can avoid the winter which also led to the Nazi defeat. But to answer the question; Yes Germany absolutely could have won.
Tell Japan to not invade America until Europe is dominated first 2. Save the Final Solution until after the war 3. Defeat Russia with Japan 7. Bomb Japan into submission 8. Nice list. Japan does not bomb Pearl Harbor. Skip the Final Solution entirely. The British Empire is on the ropes at this time. Churchill will fail a vote of no confidence in Parliament. Britain capitulates under the new Labour leadership. Britain is nothing without the Empire. Leave the U.
There is no U. Defeat Russia with Japan! At least discourage Japan from signing a non-aggression pact with Russia. The stupidest thing the Axis allowed was to have Japan bring the U.
No coordination! Why bomb Japan? Is half of the world under German domination not enough? Easier said then done. It was hard then to bomb America, given its distance from Europe. Japan was fortunate and never really keyword got a good second chance to bomb it. Plus, America has a lot of natural resources and mind-power.
America was probably the second strongest country next to Germany able to take on the rest of the planet. Germany and its new allies would have a tough fight. Russia and other country would be hesitant to join Germany bent on world domination. Leaders want more power and not less- and certainly not to Hitler. On top, America would of had played on that and it did.
A reason why Japan attacked Pearl Harbor is because America was aiding its enemies. Japan attacked the U. A because we embargoed the hell out of them. They had no oil and no food. This attack worked because of sheer luck. The radars towers did pick them up, but they thought they were allied transport planes and the times matched up the real transport planes came during the attack and were shot by friendly fire. The ships were being cleaned out and had maintenance — all the windows, hatches and doors were all left open so they all sunk easier than normal when attacked.
Moreover, the resource and manpower question, together with diminishing returns as regards mobilization and the incredible size disparity, makes it harder still. No Operation Sea Lion success. This one sticks though. Berlin steps up efforts to consolidate integration of continental Europe particularly central Europe, always at the core of long term planning — Schacht plan, etc — utilizing the enormous human capital resources and economic complementarities.
It gains from this enforced period of stability in a medium term — year Cold War context, see Erfurt and the post-war German boom for further evidence as to feasibility to develop the economic and technological resources along with enormous manpower which can ultimately bring down the USSR, with the tacit acquiescence of the USA which had defeated Japan and ending in a Brezhnev style stagnation or nuclear war.
The challenger to liberal democracy was always going to be Fascism or Communism, no one knew which one though — it was a close run thing. Hitler could have won if he: 1 United the Islamic nations into the Islamic empire again as quick as possible instead of making the kingdoms,sultanates,and republics after he freed them and giving them to Turkey Ottomans so they can rebuild the empire and get the once 2nd largest empire to his side 2 He could have invaded his enemies separately other than attacking everyone in the same time 3 He could have helped his new lands Poland,France,Scandinavia,etc.
The for reading!!!!!!!! YouTube:ahmed real there are two accounts Wanna share this share it with the username ahmed real The again. Hitler could have won the war with better public relations. Yeah, he needed Spartans whose shields can stop bullets, tanks and nuclear bombs.
Greece was probably what he admired, but it was irrelevant to world conquest. Not really. It is hard to get conquered people to join you takes a long time and some brainwashing. When Britain was about to seize Jamaica from Spain, Spain asked the Natives to join the fight and promised them benefits. The Natives ran into the caves at the first chance they got and left the Spaniards alone to taste English lead and swords.
It is hard to conquered a piece of land and then rest and try to conquered more. If you do that, the potentially-conquerable people would wise-up and get better prepared. Plus, it was not of much value during the war hard to defend given its isolation. Arabic nations were immaterial during World War II.
They were dirt poor pun intended and had no resources oil boom came later. German military was stretched thin. It could not really added more defense or things like that.
It tried to do too much and own too much. Well Germany did cut-off Britain from the empire? Black-outs were imposed because of bombing raids. Hitler believed Britain could be persuaded and could be made an ally, but he got that all wrong. In fact, he has pictures of some of the atrocities committed that were taken by his regimental photographer with him in the photos, so tell me how that could be faked in the s??
WW2 is one of the only wars in history where you can clearly point to a good side and an evil side. The bombing of Dresden and nuking of Japan were both necessary actions, the point was to send a clear message that the actions of Germany and Japan would not be tolerated ever again. Looking at Japan now, it appears to have worked. Furthermore the bombing of Dresden was done deliberately in the line of Soviet advance to send them the same message.
Whether technically war crimes or not, they were necessary and done for a reason, not on a whim or out of spite, and not comparable to genocide. Bombing specific railway lines was extremely difficult in WW2 and would not have stopped the holocaust in any meaningful way. If you truly believe that the Allies and Germans were comparably wicked I have to ask, have you ever actually studied any of this, or are you just reciting BS pro-nazi propaganda?
Losses under the British empire, a lot. Wantet to give a full answar — yes I know very well what the nazies did.. Typical neo-Nazi bullshit. Your side lost-and all decent people including most present day Germans-think that was a good thing. Hitler could have won? Would he have united Europe and the US against Communism and listeded to his Generals, he would have won the war! People really over-estimate the effectiveness of the U-boats, sure they were extremely powerful at the start of the war and took a heavy toll on supply lines, but by the middle and end of the war they were little more than death traps because we learned how to deal with them, and they were made even more obsolete after we cracked enigma.
This biggest butchers perhaps of all times? China and the United States. The U. Be careful when you judge preborn children to be not human. You think they really would have a pretty good shot at winning, right? Now go shake your fist at your pictures of Emmanuel Goldstein… or Hitler or whoever. Salute your pictures of Roosevelt… or Stalin or whoever. You know the truth. Done then there will be a civil war and all countries freed theirselves with about countries starting a death match they created new kind of weapons there is peace for a long time but the fire nation attacked and everything changes.
I can only see Hitler winning the WW2 in one way. If he succeeded in dvelepoing the atom bomb he could have easily won against both the US and Soviets. The events after that just closed his coffin and buried it. And the aftermath of the WW2 if Hitler won is also impossible to tell. But anyway my answer is -Yes Hitler could have won the war-. Hitler was 8 weeks away from launching a nuclear bomb on London, that would have been the end of the war! The map of modern Europe, in terms of the break of countries is very similar and who sits at the top of the tree in the EU.
All the Germans need to do to win was 1. Not attack the Russians until they had conquered everyone else including the u. Finish what they started in Britain and crush them completely stopping the u. Use the new Britain they conquered to make tons of boats and attack the u. He blatantly ignored advice from his inner circle of generals and although Rommel did plot against Hitler, he may have won in the Africa Korps had Hitler actually accepted his requests for resources. In the end, we not see actions themselves nor the aftermath in a discussion about fiction as if the tables were turned, Britain, America, and Russia would be tried for war crimes against German citizens.
McNamara, the secretary of defense for the United States, once said that if the U. Britain is the root of all evil. They are thieves. They stole from all over the world and now enjoy the wealth while the rest of the world lives in poverty.
It seems that the grasp of tie evades you. At various points events were accepted. We could say the French tactics at agincourt where there was the Slaughter of children. We could say the spanish empire or the Dutch or the French were equally as guilty. The slave trade was rife across all white countries. Only the Nazis did the final solution.
That speech may not have happened had Hitler not stood up Churchill a few years prior. This is noted that it had offended Churchill and Churchill then refused to meet Hitler on three subsequent occasions.
Pure speculation but the essence of this article is exactly that. And them being Buried on the surface with about feet of dirt on them. Sit down kid, you know nothing. Native Americans were slaughtered in probably the tens of millions and lost what is equivalent to the entire wealth of the United Stated. Centuries later, some sit in their reservation and drink their misery away. African-Americans lost their identity and have been mentally messed up from centuries generations - despite building the American civilization and the early wealth the fuel the wealth it has today.
Even the evil some Japanese unleashed on China like using human as target practice makes the acid burning Jews got seems like a gift. Those last two shows are but two easy examples of an irritating phenomenon: when they did parcel out information about the world in which their characters found themselves, it was heavy-handed in a way that only emphasized how much the rest of the show was wheel-spinning.
The mechanics of a bus trip to a free zone are straightforwardly stated by a character whose function is largely pure exposition. But the mechanics of how the Germans and Japanese conquered and then divided America are easily hopscotched over. TV can give very obvious information very quickly, through exposition. What it can only do far more effortfully and over a longer period of time is convey a complex society very different from our own. What would make the show more watchable in the long run?
The twist at the end of the pilot is a good sign: Prior to that, the characters had behaved exactly as we might expect them to. The central question of this show hinges upon a collision between American and Third Reich ways of life, so giving us characters who are morally compromised or hazily in-between — rather than, as many are, firmly situated on one side or the other in an intractable war — will allow the ideas of the show to reach their potential. Only the first episode is available, so far, which is exactly the wrong amount; those characters who are on one or the other side seem just like chess pieces waiting to play their part in the drama, thanks to how little we know.
0コメント